The
Lucky Chance or, The Alderman’s Bargain
Echo
Theatre
2-15-2013
Echo
Theatre’s production of The
Lucky Chance or, The Alderman’s Bargain
by Aphra Behn currently running at the Bath House Cultural Center was
an evening of highly entertaining and well executed spectacle, but
the spectacle unfortunately overshadowed the story, resulting in
amused confusion.
“The
Lucky Chance, Or The Alderman's Bargain
embraces the classic theme of innocent, young women who are betrothed
to self-serving, lustful men and is an indictment of the arranged
marriage system of Behn’s society. The self-important old roué Sir
Feeble Fainwood uses his wealth to gain lovely Leticia Bredwell as
his bride. Feeble's friend, Sir Cautious Fulbank, also bought a
bride, Julia who - like Leticia - is in love with another younger,
poorer man. The young lovers vow to end this tradition of marital
servitude before Leticia must consummate her marriage and Feeble's
daughter, Diana, becomes the next victim. Echo's streamlined new
adaptation toys with the parallels between the English Restoration
and the Sexual Revolution by setting the play in 1960’s Swinging
London. Behn's classic language collides with commedia dell' arte
style, the musical interludes of The Singing Detective and the 1960’s
sound of Hullabaloo! It’s a 1680's play done in 1960's style! The
Lucky Chance features explosive physicality and a sizzling sexuality
and requires a dozen actors playing 20+ characters.” (taken from
Echo Theatre’s publication materials)
Aphra
Behn is credited as the first published female playwright of the
English language, so it is clear why she easily fits in with Echo’s
mission. The classical text was full of wit and charm, and the
storyline is a tried and true one. It is a lesser known text, so the
plot twists were fairly surprising. Once the audience was in the
groove of the language, the jokes and the comebacks become
predictable. This doesn’t make them any less funny, though.
Director René Moreno adapted the script. Given the time period in
which it was written, one can assume he did a lot of cutting in
consideration of a modern audience’s attention span. It is doubtful
the audience experienced a tragic loss as the flow of the story, and
especially the lines, gave no hint to any cuts or rewrites.
The
Bath House Cultural Center, home of Echo Theatre’s productions, is
a small venue with seating for about 50. The proscenium stage was
painted with a giant Union Jack and had two doors for entrances on
the far upstage. A psychedelic painting of the Queen adorned one
wall. Entrances and exits were also made from the far left and right
curtains, and there was a surprise window revealed in a comedic bit
late in the first act. Other surprises are also hidden throughout the
design, but to critique them here would ruin the joke for a future
audience. It is a long space that is not very deep, but scenic
designer Clare Floyd DeVries was still able to carve out many useable
levels for the director and actors to play within. One distraction of
the design is that the doors were not flush with the floor, so
movement offstage was visible, and the all wood set made for at times
thunderous backstage travel, especially for those in high heels.
Linda Blasé’s lighting design was simple but effective: dimming
for night and no part of the stage left unseen. When it comes to the
costumes, Ryan Matthieu Smith showcased the fashion of the 1960s in
ALL its splendor. From wedding attire to bedroom lounge wear and
everything in between, I honestly don’t think a single trend of the
entire decade was left out. A well fitted and character appropriate
lime green suit was the costume highlight for me, though Leticia’s
shoes had me resisting the urge to ask the actor what size she wore
and where the shoes were procured. Props Design, shared by Rebekka
Koepke and Lynn Mauldin, was minimalistic. A few bottles of perfume,
letters, coin purses and so forth were excellent in their unobtrusive
detailed accuracy. The use of wigs was unaccredited but they were appropriately styled for the time period. However, there was a noticeable color difference between the actors' hair and the wigs that I found to be distracting.
Moreno
successfully unites the farcical design elements with his more than
capable actors to create a fun and colorful world. The juxtaposition
of the belletristic text with the music, clothes, and general
attitudes of the 1960s somehow worked. The blocking was always
organic and clearly motivated, and with some help from Sara
Romersberger, who was credited with Choreography and Movement, even
the scene changes proved to be a source of entertainment.
The standout directing choice by Moreno in this production was the use of a variety of 1960s music that the actors lip synced while remaining in character. I lost track of how many performances there were after seven such musical interludes. Though each number was performed with absolute dedication and the finesse of trained dancers in a Broadway musical, the joke got old after a while. And they didn’t just sing the chorus or a verse of the song. No, they often sang the entire thing. The first number, as much from shock value as for delivery, was met with laughter and applause. The only other number greeted with such enthusiasm was Adrian Spencer Churchill’s rendition of Ol’ Blue Eyes’ I Did it My Way at the end. Before I criticize the bold choice, let me stress that the songs were well performed, and the audience found them to be entertaining. If such a category existed, they would be nominated for best lip synced musical. However, the songs did not add to the story and in many ways detracted from it. Part of the detraction was the flip from classical to contemporary language. It jarred the audience and left our ear out of tune when the dialogue picked back up. Also, the songs added to the run time of the show which clocked in at just over two and a half hours with one intermission. (This show could have benefited from a second intermission or just more cuts.) Once the music started, I often stopped paying attention to the story and instead became the person in the audience who noticed things like my neighbor’s beautiful watch, wondering when the show could get on. It was entertaining, and I did my best to have fun with the actors, but in the end, I was fed just too many lip synced exhibitions.
The standout directing choice by Moreno in this production was the use of a variety of 1960s music that the actors lip synced while remaining in character. I lost track of how many performances there were after seven such musical interludes. Though each number was performed with absolute dedication and the finesse of trained dancers in a Broadway musical, the joke got old after a while. And they didn’t just sing the chorus or a verse of the song. No, they often sang the entire thing. The first number, as much from shock value as for delivery, was met with laughter and applause. The only other number greeted with such enthusiasm was Adrian Spencer Churchill’s rendition of Ol’ Blue Eyes’ I Did it My Way at the end. Before I criticize the bold choice, let me stress that the songs were well performed, and the audience found them to be entertaining. If such a category existed, they would be nominated for best lip synced musical. However, the songs did not add to the story and in many ways detracted from it. Part of the detraction was the flip from classical to contemporary language. It jarred the audience and left our ear out of tune when the dialogue picked back up. Also, the songs added to the run time of the show which clocked in at just over two and a half hours with one intermission. (This show could have benefited from a second intermission or just more cuts.) Once the music started, I often stopped paying attention to the story and instead became the person in the audience who noticed things like my neighbor’s beautiful watch, wondering when the show could get on. It was entertaining, and I did my best to have fun with the actors, but in the end, I was fed just too many lip synced exhibitions.
The 12 member cast
devoured the classical language and offered it to the audience
without the pretention often associated with other classical works.
Comedic bits were played off with ease, and their energy and
dedication to the moment oozed off the stage. They gave it their all,
and the audience responded in kind. I laughed even when something
wasn’t funny because I was trying to reciprocate, sending positive
audience energy back to the actors. Of particular note was the use of
London accents- each character with his or her own class distinction
that every single actor performed admirably.
Opening
the show with a monologue chalk full of expose the audience needed
was Austin Tindle as Mr. Bellmour. He was one of the young men whose
lover had been arranged into marriage with a much older man. He
schemed his way into the home of the bride and began an elaborate
plot to win her back. With ease, perfect diction and a willingness to
connect directly with his audience, Tindle carried the audience into
the show as easily as he might invite us into his own home. Playing
the other jilted lover, Charles Gayman, was Brandon Sterrett. In the
opening scene, he seemed tripped up by the dialogue, but this was
remedied by the second scene and was never a problem again. His
shining moment came in a would-be steamy scene with his much older
landlady (played by Kateri Cale) in which he fights the urge to
vomit.
Laurel
Alons as Lady Julia Fulbank and Martha Harms as Leticia were the
young women suffering from arranged marriages to much older men.
Harms was most believable in her angst and broken heart. I also felt
she and Tindle were better matched as a couple. Alons was a strong
actress who brought a lot of fire to her character, but I felt a
genuine passion was missing during her encounters with Sterrett. It’s
almost as if they were telling the audience “We are in love, we are
in love” only to leave us doubting the statements once they finally
shared the stage. Her most truthful moment was when she seductively,
silently gestured “come hither” while lying on a bed.
Sir
Feeble Fainwood and Sir Cautious Fulbank are played by Bradley
Campbell and Adrian Spencer Churchill, respectively. Campbell relished in
playing the biggest kid on the stage with over the top physicality,
facial expressions and vocalizations. He really sparked to life
during the second act, and I found myself anxiously awaiting his
return to a scene. The biggest laugh of the entire evening for me
came when he talked about the scary ghosts. Churchill, as mentioned
before, had his standout moment during I
Did it My Way,
but it was not his only time to shine. While debating the loss of his
wife verses the loss of 300£, he had the audience in stitches.
Carissa
Jade Olsen as Diana (Fainwood’s daughter who also had her
engagement arranged) was appropriately wide eyed and utilized her
long hair and slender frame to woe not only her intended but the
audience as well. She handled the emotional context with relative
ease- easily portraying a ditzy young woman in love, but what seemed
to be a slight speech impediment made it difficult to understand her
at times. Dan Schmoker as Mr. Bredwell- another poor servant in love,
was able to truly shine in both voice and physicalization when he
donned the cape, top hat, and mask of Satan himself. The switch from
Mr. Bredwell to Mr. Bredwell as Satan was so complete and highly
entertaining that I applaud him for creating a character within a
character. Ian Ferguson as Mr. Bearjest appeared to be a minor
comedic character who helped open the first Act, but gave a surprise
turn by the end of Act II. Ferguson was engaged in every scene and
was the quintessential smarmy rich kid.
An
actor who plays multiple roles in a single production with acute
attention to details such as voice, accent and physical
characterization along with the added design elements such as
costuming deserve special recognition. Lauren Davis, Kateri Cale and
Nathan Autrey played at least nine characters. Each time he or she
entered the stage, a complete transformation had occurred to the
point I had to double check it was only a cast of 12. Davis used her
deep voice and slow walk to seduce characters and was able to flip
comedically from an English accent to a French accent with ease.
Servant Gammer Grime and Landlady Pert were played to perfection by
Kateri Cale, an Echo producing partner. Autrey and I attended college
together, and so it was a joy to see him onstage once again in a
highly comedic role. His transformations between characters (playing
four in total) was a constant source of entertainment for the entire
audience.
Overall,
Echo Theatre’s production of Aphra Behn’s The
Lucky Chance Or, The Alderman’s Bargain
was an high energy and commendable spectacle that left the audience
perplexingly charmed.
_______________________________________________________
Runs Thursdays, Fridays, and Saturdays at 8pm and Sundays at 2pm through February 23.
Tickets are available by calling 214-904-0500 or online at www.echotheatre.org
Bath House Cultural Center
521 E. Lawther Drive
Dallas, TX 75218
________________________________________________________
Director: René Moreno
Choreography and Movement: Sara Romersberger
Set Design: Clare Floyd DeVries
Sound Design: Pam Myers-Morgan
Stage Manager: Kelsey Ervi
Lighting Design: Linda Blase
Costume Design: Ryan Matthieu Smith
Props Design: Lynn Mauldin and Rebekka Koepke
Sir Feeble Fainwood: Bradlley Campbell
Sir Cautious Fulbank: Adrian Spencer Churchill
Mr. Gayman: Brandon Sterrett
Mr. Bellmour: Austin Tindle
Mr. Bredwell: Dan Schmoker
Mr. Bearjest: Ian Ferguson
Ralph, Captain Noisey, Dick, Shepardess: Nathan Autrey
Lady Julia Fulbank: Laurel Alons
Leticia: Martha Harms
Diana: Carissa Jade Olsen
Phillis, Postwoman, Rag: Lauren Davis
Gammer Grime, Pert: Kateri Cale
Board Operator: Rebecca Brooks
No comments:
Post a Comment